In the quiet dawn light of the Persian Gulf, the loose linen of a chador drapes like a sail catching an invisible breeze. A face half-hidden by a scarf becomes not a concession but a canvas of possibility, where color and texture can play anew. In my experience as an Iranian designer, raised amidst the scented frankincense of Bandar Abbas markets and the riot of color at Hormozgan festivals, modest dress has never felt like constraint. It is instead a deliberate aesthetic choice and a form of spiritual resonance. Modesty becomes the visual poetry of the body – a celebration of layers and silhouettes that conceal as much as they reveal. For me, every fold of fabric carries meaning, each color recalls the ochre earth or the cool twilight of the Gulf. It is a reminder that beauty need not shout; it can whisper through patterns of geometry and the intricate script of embroidery, drawing from the deep vocabulary of Islamic art and Persian textile tradition. In this sense, covering is not erasure but a statement of intention – a carefully composed picture where what is hidden is as eloquent as what is shown.
Across disciplines scholars are grappling with how to talk about this, too. Anthropologists and sociologists note that dress is a fundamental layer of identity-making. Muslim women, whether in Tehran or Chicago, often “use dress to construct ethno-religious identity and community,” shaping personal and collective self-image through what they wear . We see this clearly in the modest style: religion, culture, gender all inform how a garment is chosen or tailored . As one study of Muslim American women observes, the fluidity in modest fashion practice underlines that clothing is a form of self-narration. It’s not uniform; it’s a dialogue. Indeed, some fashion theorists describe modest attire as inherently politicized, even feminist – a “feminist strategy of conspicuous visibility” that challenges sexism and racism . By concealing bodily contours, modest garments invite onlookers to perceive the wearer in new dimensions – as a subject of thought or belief rather than merely an object of sight. The scholar Tiina Rosenberg reminds us that modest fashion by definition “refers to clothing that conceals rather than delineates the contours of the human body,” and that this act of concealing can itself be empowering . In other words, the hijab and long tunics become not tools of invisibility, but bold, conscious choices that “create space for Muslim women” in public life . By wearing these forms, women assert control over how they are read by society, reshaping dress into an instrument of agency.
This is not a passing fad, but a global industry and cultural phenomenon. Recent reports estimate the modest fashion market at roughly $44 billion per year globally, about 18% of all clothing expenditures by Muslim consumers . Major brands from Dolce & Gabbana to H&M have launched collections tailored to modest dress codes, and “modest fashion weeks” now take place around the world – from Dubai to London, Jakarta to Kuala Lumpur . These events spotlight designers who reinterpret Islamic notions of veiling and covering in couture. In fact, researchers note that as Western runway audiences awaken to this spending power, mainstream fashion calendars now schedule runway shows dedicated to modest fashion . For example, in 2017 a sequential procession of modest collections was seen in New York, Turin and Paris fashion weeks, and Dubai’s Fashion Forward even boasts a decade-long history of championing Middle Eastern modest designers . These platforms prove that covering can coexist with high style: flowing abayas with volumized sleeves, tunics with architectural hemlines, headscarves embroidered with intricate geometry.
Across such catwalks, models stride forth in draped silks and layered cottons that command attention even while modestly covered. The visual impact is striking: a line of figures in neutral tones and hijabs against a dark runway, projecting calm confidence. This contemporary modest aesthetic indeed embodies what Rosenberg calls a “conspicuous visibility” – not through flesh or form, but through shape, movement, and ornamentation . Designers achieve this visibility with every choice of cloth and cut. High necklines and full-length robes elevate elegance without excess, and monochrome or gently contrasting palettes echo the monochromatic power of traditional dress. In this way, modest design demonstrates that covering up need not mean hiding; it can mean refining. It is an aesthetic language that speaks through proportion and detail rather than exposure. In fact, fashion theorists remind us that what the Western gaze often dismisses as “hiding” actually creates a surface for artistic expression – rich brocades, embroidered borders, Arabic calligraphy motifs – turning the body into a moving artwork. As the Metropolitan Museum notes, Islamic art has long prized calligraphy and geometry as “the most highly regarded and fundamental” elements of decoration . These same patterns and scripts now find new life on scarves and abayas, connecting the cloth we wear to centuries of visual culture.
The thread of modest fashion runs deep through my own coastal heritage. Southern Iran – the Hormozgan province of Bandar Abbas and beyond – has always been a crossroads of trade and culture, where Persian, Arab, and African traditions interweave. Local people cherish clothing that is practical for the heat (light fabrics, loose pants) yet vibrant and ornate. Women in this region often wear a two-piece Bandari dress: a calf-length printed robe or chador (often in pastel blues, greens, pinks) over embroidered billowy trousers cinched at the ankle . The signature Bandari chador is noted for its sky-blue, mustard-yellow, or mulberry patterns – motifs that recall waves or palm fronds – and is cut wide to flow freely. Loose cotton or rayon pants with colored trim allow air to circulate, and sometimes a sheer burqa (face covering) is added for privacy, though it is less common on everyday use. Men too traditionally don garments very different from Western suiting: in Hormozgan and across the Gulf they often wear a white Dashadasheh (thawb), a simple ankle-length robe of lightweight fabric, topped with a thin wool cloak (Besht) for chilly nights, and a checked keffiyeh to shade the head . These garments – plain in cut but telling in context – exemplify what might be called an “anti-fashion” tradition. They neither flaunt body shape nor seasonal trend; instead, they signal regional identity and communal values. A white thawb and keffiyeh, for instance, speak of faith and family lineage as much as they do of modesty. In fact, by wearing such uniform looser silhouettes and subdued palettes, wearers have long exercised a quiet resistance to the idea that women’s bodies must be the primary spectacle. This unwitting “power” of anti-fashion clothing is now being recognized: garments that were once seen as banal or oppressive become, under the lens of history, statements of dignity and cultural pride.
The southern coasts are also home to Iran’s Afro-Iranian population, descendants of East African peoples brought through the Indian Ocean slave trade centuries ago. They number in the tens of thousands, concentrated in Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, and on islands like Qeshm . Their cultural imprint is vivid. Afro-Iranian communities have preserved distinct music and dance forms – such as the zar trance ceremonies – that blend African rhythms with Persian melodies. These ceremonies are more than healing rites; they are communal art, where women often dress in colorful layered outfits to perform call-and-response drum dances aimed at banishing spirits. Indeed, zar (literally “wind” or “breath”) ceremonies remain an important thread in southern Iran’s tapestry . One ethnographic observer notes that Afro-Iranian zar rituals involve trance-like dances accompanied by the dammam drum and tambourine, reflecting African heritage in this Persian Gulf setting . These rituals are a living reminder that some of the most innovative patterns of fabric and movement trace back to African roots. In ceremonies, women traditionally don simple white dresses or tunics – a purity of linen reflecting spiritual cleansing – and adorn themselves with beads, coins, and shells that jingle to the beat. The act of dressing for zar thus influences how local designers think about layering, texture, and even color. For instance, participants often begin Zar sessions in plain white – as one guide notes, those who join the Ahl al-Hawa (“people of the winds”) must “wear clean and white clothes” during the ceremony – but as the trance deepens, color and ornamentation appear in scarves and pendants, echoing transformation. Even today, inspiration from Zar surfaces on runways: shifting panels of fabric evoke the undulating cloth of a trance dance, and metallic embroidery recalls the rain of coins worn by possessed dancers.
Silhouettes that conceal also shape perceptions of gender, power, and resistance. To some Western eyes the headscarf and long coat might seem limiting, but to many wearers it can signify self-possession. Garments that render the body less visible can paradoxically make a statement of autonomy: a woman who is not defined by curves might redirect attention to her words or her walk. Sociology finds that clothing functions as a code of signaling – when one chooses modest garb, it can signal piety, yes, but also intentional rebellion against a hypersexualized ideal. Indeed, modest attire in Iran has long carried a double life. In pre-revolutionary times, Westernized elites wore short skirts and body-hugging cuts as symbols of modernity, while more conservative or grassroots women maintained long, loose styles as markers of dignity. The reversal after 1979 – when long loose coats and headscarves became legally mandated – complicated the symbolism. Many Iranian women today navigate a spectrum: some adopt bold styling of the obligatory “manteau” and scarf to reclaim power (bright colors, creative draping, asymmetry), while others quietly resist by subtly tweaking the rules (unbuttoned coats, loose scarves).
Sociologists argue that even “invisibility” can be an instrument of subversion. Covered clothing can shield women from the unwanted male gaze – a power reduction of objectification – while also asserting their presence on their own terms. In public debates, scholars note that modern modest fashion “has gone on since the beginning of time and it’s going to go on to the end of time,” as one industry leader put it . Rather than the hijab being a static relic, it evolves with each generation. The garment itself acquires new meanings: the black chador of an austere past now sometimes serves as a canvas for embroidered poetry or lace trim. The white cotton mantle once worn by rural women for work is resurfacing in palazzos and abayas by avant-garde designers. In this way, modest clothing mediates a dialogue between generations of Iranian women – between grandmothers who learned to stitch traditional khamees dresses and granddaughters who reinterpret those cuts on the global stage.
Historically, Iran’s relationship with modest dress has been forged by politics. In the early 20th century, the Pahlavi monarchy pursued a Europeanizing agenda: Reza Shah banned the veil in 1936, even forcing women to ride unveiled as a show of modernity . Later, his son’s regime equated the headscarf with backwardness; by mid-century, a veiled woman was often presumed rural or uneducated. This state-imposed unveiling made fashion a matter of state policy and cultural struggle. Then in 1979, the Islamic Republic abruptly reversed course. Ayatollah Khomeini decreed that women entering public workplaces must wear the hijab and long coat . A day later, in what became a historic protest, many women poured into the streets chanting “We did not have a revolution to take a step backwards” . Thereafter, for decades, Iran’s dress code was strictly enforced by the morality police: women who exposed hair or wore tight garments were fined or barred from jobs. In this charged context, every fold of fabric became politically charged: a black chador could be a sign of devotion to the revolution, or a symbol of modesty chosen freely. Those who later won beauty pageants in modest attire around the world, like Miss Hijab contestants, were challenging old prejudices by showing that covering up could coexist with confidence and glamour.
Even as fashion historians document these shifts, it’s clear the conversation is ongoing. Today’s young Iranians are both shaped by tradition and global change. A new generation of designers – male and female, working in Tehran and abroad – are crafting modest wear that speaks to this hybrid experience. They draw on heritage techniques like Persian silk weaving, intricate jacquard brocades, and calligraphic patterning, integrating them into prêt-à-porter modest collections. Global modest-fashion entrepreneurs note that this trend isn’t just religious or cultural; it appeals to a broad demographic: travelers, parents, working women, the fashion-conscious who simply favor elegance with ease . One industry voice cautions against imagining a single “Islamic style” – after all, Muslim women around the world interpret modesty differently. What unites them, however, is a savvy understanding of dress as layered meaning. Even in the West, celebrities and politicians who wear hijab – from lawmaker Ilhan Omar to model Halima Aden – seize the runway to tell their own stories. They echo the point made by fashion thinkers: modest clothing can be “about producing clothing made ethically, with respect to the environment,” and it can be high concept art, not a uniform.
In the broader economy of images and desires, modest fashion has proven both resilient and transformative. Economically, it has turned into a powerhouse – $44 billion and climbing – but culturally it has done something subtler: it has invited the rest of the world to see the beauty in restraint. Western magazines and social media now show runway hijab collections alongside leather minis; denim on women with covered hair. Still, the Western media often fall into Orientalist habits, reducing every variant of Islamic dress to a single stereotype of “the veil” . This narrow view fails to grasp the richness we know: that modest fashion is not a “uniform or ethnic clothing,” as one modest-fashion CEO warns , but a continually creative field. It is more than a passing trend; it is woven into the textures of modernity and memory alike.
Looking forward, I believe modest fashion will continue to grow in influence, partly because it expresses values that many share: sustainability (fewer cuts, more longevity), mindfulness (attention to form and detail), and an ethos of respect (for oneself and one’s community). The Iranian voice in this movement is strong and clarion. Our history – from the Qajar textiles to the poet Saʿdi’s metaphors of veiled love – insists that covering can be charged with meaning. Personally, I see every Islamic geometric pattern and every flowing jalabiya as part of a long conversation about the sacred and the sensual. The future of modest fashion, I imagine, is one where boundaries between East and West blur: where a young woman in London might pair a silk Persian brocade kaftan with Italian loafers, or a runway show in Tehran might feature Scandinavian clean lines next to traditional Nigerian embroidery. The lesson from our southern coast is that diversity breeds creativity: just as Bandar Abbas is a port where peoples and styles met, so too is fashion a meeting point.
In the end, modesty is not merely an absence but a presence – presence of intention, of history, of artistry. It is a deliberate aesthetic stance that anchors us in cultural memory even as it sails into the future. For many Muslims and many others, choosing modesty in dress is both spiritual and stylistic, a quiet revolution of the wardrobe. As an Iranian designer immersed in these worlds, I see modesty’s promise in every stitch: an affirmation that the human form can be honored in darkness as well as in light, that beauty thrives not only in exposure but also in enigma. It is a promise I believe the future will increasingly embrace, giving voice to an Iran-style modesty that is at once proudly local and profoundly universal.